See attached document Study Guide for Benztropine This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is

See attached document

Study Guide for Benztropine

This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is intended to be a useful learning tool for you to use as you prepare for your clinical courses.

Create a 3- to 4-page (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study. Your medication guide should be in the form of an outline and should include a title page, citations, and references. You should incorporate visual elements, such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative!

Note: Your Medication Study Guide should not be in the format of an APA paper.

Also Note: Your guide should be informed by the FDA-Approved and Evidenced-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines Research.

Areas of importance that you should address—but are not limited to—include:

· Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent, including brand and generic names, as well as appropriate FDA indication uses

· Any supporting, valid, and reliable research for non-FDA uses

· Drug classification

· The medication mechanism of action

· The medication pharmacokinetics

· The medication pharmacodynamics

· Appropriate dosing, administration route, and any considerations for dosing alterations

· Considerations of use and dosing in specific specialty populations, such as children, adolescents, elderly, pregnant people, those exhibiting suicidal behaviors, etc.

· Definition of half-life, why half-life is important, and the half-life for your assigned medication

· Side effects/adverse reactions potential

· Discuss clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia Note: Be sure to include screening tools that would be utilized.

· Contraindications for use including significant drug to drug interactions

· Overdose considerations

· Diagnostics and labs monitoring comorbidities considerations

· Legal, ethical, and social considerations

· Pertinent patient education considerations

Support your rationale with a minimum of three (3) academic resources.

Please review the grading rubric for criteria evaluated.

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes brand and generic names, FDA uses, classification, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, dosing, administration, considerations for alternate dosing, considerations for prescribing specialty populations, definition of half-life, why half-life important, and what is the half-life for assigned medication, side effects/adverse reaction potentials, contraindications, overdose considerations, diagnostics/labs, and patient education consideration.

50 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

36 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes 75% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

24 to >11.0 pts

Fair

The response describes 50% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted some inaccuracy in information provided.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes 25% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted significant inaccuracies in information provided.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia with screening tool to be utilized included.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Provides inaccurate screening tools.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and/or Tardive Dyskinesia, or it is missing. No screening tools.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes legal, ethical and social considerations.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The response accurately analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the analysis.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the analysis.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources were used.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 5 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline, but no visual elements included for the appropriate audience. The guide is not as succinct and is 6–7 pages. two (2) evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The study guide is not properly formatted as an outline but is a paper. The guide is long, succinct, and is 8+ pages. One or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE Review the Rubric for more Guidance Demographics

SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE Review the Rubric for more Guidance Demographics Chief Complaint (Reason for seeking health care) History of Present Illness (HPI) Allergies Review of Systems (ROS) General: HEENT: Neck: Lungs: Cardio Breast: GI: M/F genital: GU: Neuro Musculo: Activity: Psychosocial: Derm: Nutrition: Sleep/Rest: LMP: STI Hx: Vital Signs Labs

Template: Community Profile Inventory       

Template: Community Profile Inventory        Names_________________________________________________________       Date_____  Community 35205 Birmingham AL south 5 point area      Category Health Implications    PTS III. Health information – 80 points      A. Psychological climate  1. Self-concept (community perception of mental health)  2. Attitude/support r/t mental health  3. Suicide rates    

Patricia Martin Giraldino Florida National University Decision Making 10/29/2024 Consider how clinical judgment, critical thinking, and decision

Patricia Martin Giraldino Florida National University Decision Making 10/29/2024 Consider how clinical judgment, critical thinking, and decision-making are similar and different, and describe these in your own words. Clinical reasoning, thinking, and decision-making are closely intertwined processes but are not completely synonymous in function and usage. Clinical judgment refers to

pls see attachment for further instructions  Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders

pls see attachment for further instructions  Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders Case 3 Chief Complaint (CC)  A 11-year-old female patient complains of red left eye and edematous eyelids. Her mother states the child complains of “sand in my left eye.” Subjective Patient noticed redness three days ago. Denies having any

Module 3 Discussion      Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders For this

Module 3 Discussion      Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for one of the following cases. Your instructor will assign you your case number. Case 1 Chief Complaint (CC)  A 57-year-old man

Module 3 Discussion     ACA and Health-Care Outcomes & Costs

Module 3 Discussion     ACA and Health-Care Outcomes & Costs What components of the ACA do you think will have a positive effect on improving health care outcomes and decreasing costs?    Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA

Using the following source;  Health Care Access and Quality – Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov , make an initial post following the rubric.    This

Using the following source;  Health Care Access and Quality – Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov , make an initial post following the rubric.    This week, you will consider assessment questions and appropriate interventions related to social determinants of health. Healthy physical, social, and economic environments strengthen the potential to achieve