Choose one measuring or evaluative question for a palliative care australia that could form the foundation of an impact measurement approach.
Design an impact measurement/evaluation approach responding to the question specifying indicators, methods, engagement strategy, reporting approach and limitations of the approach.
Slide 1: Organisation’s Reporting Overview and Purpose
- Provide a brief outline of the organisation and the purpose for the measurement/evaluation
- Identify the approach/ framework that will be adopted to address the one measuring or evaluative question.
Slide 2: Indicators and Rationale
- Identify two or three indicators you would use to answer the question
- Provide a rationale for selecting these indicators
Slide 3: Methods and Rationale
- Describe the methods you would use to measure these indicators. Choose two-three methods for each indicator which include at least one qualitative and one quantitative method
- Provide a rationale for selecting these methods
Slide 4: Engagement Strategy with Stakeholders
- Identify the stakeholder groups you would include in data collection
- Explain how you would ensure fair representation
Slide 5: Reporting and Decision-Making
- Describe the audiences for the report and the key decision-makers who could implement actions based on the collected data
- Describe how you would report on the findings from the collected data
- Explain how the report could influence decision-making within the given context
Slide 6: Limitations, Risks and Mitigation Strategies
- Identify limitations and/or potential abuse gaming, pink washing, green washing
- Identify mitigation strategies you would put in place to ensure rigour and validity
Incoperate and use these references:
Mapping palliative and end of care research in Australia (2000-2018)
Comprehensive Palliative Care in AgedCare Measure – Evaluation Framework
Rapid Guide to Designing SMART Indicators
The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) – measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis
End-of-life care quality measures: beyond place of death
How to solve
Nursing Powerpoint
Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
In order to assess the impact of a palliative care program in Australia, an evaluative question can be devised to form the foundation of an impact measurement approach. This approach will involve the identification of indicators, methods for measurement, engagement strategies with stakeholders, reporting approach, as well as limitations and mitigation strategies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the program’s effectiveness and inform decision-making for improvements.
Answer:
Question: How does the palliative care program in Australia contribute to the quality of life for terminally ill patients?
Slide 1: Organisation’s Reporting Overview and Purpose
– The palliative care program in Australia aims to provide holistic care and support for terminally ill patients and their families during the end-of-life stage.
– The chosen approach is the Comprehensive Palliative Care in Aged Care Measure (CPC-ACM) – Evaluation Framework, which focuses on assessing the quality of care provided within aged care facilities.
Slide 2: Indicators and Rationale
– Indicator 1: Patient satisfaction with pain management services
– Rationale: This indicator reflects the effectiveness of pain management interventions and the impact on the overall quality of life for patients.
– Indicator 2: Family satisfaction with emotional support provided by the palliative care team
– Rationale: This indicator emphasizes the importance of emotional support in addressing the psychosocial needs of terminally ill patients and their families.
Slide 3: Methods and Rationale
– Indicator 1: Patient satisfaction with pain management services
– Qualitative method: Conducting in-depth interviews with a sample of patients to explore their experiences and perceptions of pain management.
– Quantitative method: Administering a validated survey instrument to a larger sample of patients to measure satisfaction levels with pain management services.
– Rationale: By utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods, a comprehensive understanding of the patient’s perspective on pain management can be obtained.
– Indicator 2: Family satisfaction with emotional support provided by the palliative care team
– Qualitative method: Focus group discussions with family members to gather rich insights into their experiences and satisfaction level.
– Quantitative method: Distributing a standardized satisfaction questionnaire to family members and analyzing the aggregated responses.
– Rationale: The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods enables a comprehensive assessment of the emotional support provided by the palliative care team.
Slide 4: Engagement Strategy with Stakeholders
– Stakeholder groups: Terminally ill patients, their families, palliative care practitioners, aged care facility managers, and policymakers.
– Fair representation: Engaging diverse stakeholders through targeted recruitment, ensuring participation from different geographical locations and cultural backgrounds.
Slide 5: Reporting and Decision-Making
– Audiences for the report: Palliative care practitioners, aged care facility managers, policymakers, and relevant healthcare organizations.
– Key decision-makers: Aged care facility managers and policymakers responsible for implementing and shaping palliative care policies.
– Reporting approach: Data summarized in a comprehensive report, including graphical representations, key findings, and recommendations for improvement.
– Influence on decision-making: The report aims to provide evidence-based insights that will inform decisions regarding resource allocation, training, and improving the quality of care provided.
Slide 6: Limitations, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies
– Limitations: Potential response bias in self-reported measures, limited generalizability due to the inclusion of specific aged care facilities, and challenges in capturing the complexity of emotional support.
– Mitigation strategies: Implementing rigorous data collection protocols, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity to encourage honest responses, conducting a pilot study to refine the evaluation approach, and considering a mixed-methods approach to enhance the validity of findings.
References:
1. Mapping palliative and end-of-life care research in Australia (2000-2018)
2. Comprehensive Palliative Care in Aged Care Measure – Evaluation Framework
3. Rapid Guide to Designing SMART Indicators
4. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) – measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis
5. End-of-life care quality measures: beyond place of death
